WGMI vs. BITI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) and BITI (ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. WGMI is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WGMI returned 88.52%/yr vs -34.84%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.67, they often move in opposite directions. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

WGMI vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 81.24% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 27.41% return.

WGMI

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 25.79%
• YTD: 81.24%
• 6M: 46.67%
• 1Y: 261.44%
• 3Y*: 88.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: 27.75%
• YTD: 27.41%
• 6M: 34.37%
• 1Y: 47.79%
• 3Y*: -34.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGMI vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	81.24%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-56.22%
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF	27.41%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WGMI and BITI is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	-0.67

The correlation between WGMI and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.67 (all time) to -0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WGMI vs. BITI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WGMI	BITI
Financial Services	51.3%	28.5%
Technology	45.9%	-
Communication Services	1.2%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Industrials	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

WGMI vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 32
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGMI vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGMI	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.48	1.10	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.67	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.20	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	1.90	+3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.48	4.06	+6.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGMI vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGMI and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGMI	BITI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48	1.10	+2.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	-0.71	+1.02

Drawdowns

WGMI vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGMI	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-92.16%	+6.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.94%	-25.28%	-25.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.79%	-84.63%	+21.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-86.09%	+83.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.86%	-67.97%	+25.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.08%	11.80%	+13.28%

Volatility

WGMI vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 8.92%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGMI	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.90%	8.92%	+9.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.08%	33.40%	+21.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.99%	43.55%	+32.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.50%	52.50%	+29.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.50%	52.50%	+29.00%

WGMI vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGMI vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF	9.27%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGMI and BITI in my portfolio?

WGMI and BITI have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGMI or BITI?

WGMI has higher volatility (18.90%) compared to BITI (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, WGMI or BITI?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 88.52% vs -34.84% for BITI. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 8.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WGMI or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 88.52% return vs -34.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WGMI or BITI?

WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WGMI or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 9.27%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between WGMI and BITI?

They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.