PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (WGLD.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while GOLB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GOLB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGLD.DE achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than GOLB.L's 6.83% return.


WGLD.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
2.75%
6M
6.40%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*

GOLB.L

1D
0.91%
1M
1.09%
YTD
6.83%
6M
11.48%
1Y
70.13%
3Y*
40.51%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WGLD.DE
WisdomTree Core Physical Gold
2.75%49.08%34.17%9.39%7.07%9.65%
GOLB.L
Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF
6.83%126.01%19.55%2.46%-3.88%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WGLD.DE and GOLB.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021

0.67

The correlation between WGLD.DE and GOLB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGLD.DE
WGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
WGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLB.L
GOLB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GOLB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (WGLD.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WGLD.DEGOLB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.53

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

6.38

-1.78

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the GOLB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGLD.DE and GOLB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WGLD.DEGOLB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.66

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.59

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.16

+1.11

Drawdowns

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.58%, smaller than the maximum GOLB.L drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGLD.DE and GOLB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGLD.DEGOLB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-81.65%

+65.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.58%

-27.58%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.58%

-27.58%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-39.87%

+23.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.99%

-22.81%

+7.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-49.02%

+44.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

10.92%

-4.38%

Volatility

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (WGLD.DE) is 5.05%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L) has a volatility of 14.83%. This indicates that WGLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGLD.DEGOLB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

14.83%

-9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

33.35%

-13.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

42.04%

-18.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

34.31%

-18.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

35.01%

-19.13%

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGLD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

WGLD.DE vs. GOLB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WGLD.DE nor GOLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WGLD.DE and GOLB.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WGLD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WGLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOLB.L.

WGLD.DE tracks Gold, while GOLB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WGLD.DE and 0.65% for GOLB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGLD.DE and GOLB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer