PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFPAX vs. WFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFPAX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 10.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFPAX having a 10.35% annualized return and WFMIX not far ahead at 10.80%.


WFPAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.26%
YTD
9.80%
6M
10.22%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.35%

WFMIX

1D
0.92%
1M
3.35%
YTD
10.96%
6M
9.80%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFPAX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A
9.80%5.81%11.58%9.17%-4.95%28.14%2.93%39.96%-13.42%10.82%
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.96%6.14%11.95%9.54%-4.65%28.53%3.27%40.27%-13.12%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WFPAX and WFMIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

1.00

The correlation between WFPAX and WFMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFPAX vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFPAX
WFPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WFPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WFPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

WFMIX
WFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
WFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFPAXWFMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.15

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.06

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

6.80

-0.74

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the WFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFPAX and WFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFPAXWFMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.45

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFPAX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, which is greater than WFMIX's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFPAX and WFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFPAXWFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.20%

-52.70%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-9.66%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-18.30%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-22.13%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.81%

-43.80%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

0.00%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-7.49%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.93%

+0.02%

Volatility

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) have volatilities of 3.99% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFPAXWFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.02%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

10.56%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.96%

13.95%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.19%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.91%

+0.02%

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFPAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFPAX vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison

WFPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, more than WFMIX's 10.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.13%11.24%8.00%5.51%8.71%9.87%0.66%7.48%2.74%4.41%1.44%4.47%
WFPAX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A
10.36%11.38%7.97%5.39%8.69%9.86%0.36%7.38%2.40%4.14%1.08%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, WFPAX and WFMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WFMIX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to WFPAX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFPAX dropped -56.20% vs WFMIX's -52.70%.

WFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFPAX and WFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer