PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFIVX vs. DTLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) and Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIVX achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than DTLGX's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WFIVX has underperformed DTLGX with an annualized return of 14.07%, while DTLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.94% annualized return.


WFIVX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.61%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.35%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
14.07%

DTLGX

1D
-0.50%
1M
6.68%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.11%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
16.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
11.56%16.31%22.59%24.97%-18.97%25.51%19.90%29.74%-5.66%20.29%
DTLGX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio
9.70%21.95%35.90%39.81%-31.60%22.61%38.78%28.64%-2.20%27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between WFIVX and DTLGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1999

0.94

The correlation between WFIVX and DTLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFIVX vs. DTLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFIVX
WFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DTLGX
DTLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DTLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) and Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFIVXDTLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.81

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.97

6.28

+8.69

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the DTLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIVX and DTLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFIVXDTLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.83

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.67

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.80

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.55

-0.14

Drawdowns

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIVX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, roughly equal to the maximum DTLGX drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIVX and DTLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFIVXDTLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-56.57%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-17.05%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-24.20%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-35.84%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.62%

-35.84%

+1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.50%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-13.87%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

4.91%

-2.98%

Volatility

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) is 2.89%, while Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that WFIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFIVXDTLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.79%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

12.77%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

16.93%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

22.05%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

21.30%

-3.11%

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFIVX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than DTLGX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFIVX vs. DTLGX - Dividend Comparison

WFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, less than DTLGX's 23.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTLGX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio
23.62%25.91%13.48%0.09%20.78%22.68%21.08%10.06%16.96%9.01%12.35%11.48%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
8.04%8.97%2.79%3.33%5.18%7.25%9.16%5.06%5.97%8.83%2.06%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFIVX and DTLGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTLGX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to WFIVX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFIVX dropped -55.43% vs DTLGX's -56.57%.

WFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFIVX and DTLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer