WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L
WFIN.AS (SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - WFIN.AS is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WFIN.AS returned 11.76%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for SGLN.L. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. WFIN.AS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WFIN.AS is traded in EUR, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFIN.AS achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than SGLN.L's 4.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WFIN.AS has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 11.76%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.
WFIN.AS
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 27.69%
- 5Y*
- 19.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFIN.AS SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF | -0.53% | 14.32% | 35.51% | 11.89% | -4.62% | 39.49% | -11.39% | 27.43% | -12.91% | 7.84% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.16% | 45.64% | 34.39% | 9.51% | 6.07% | 3.76% | 13.12% | 21.93% | 3.07% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFIN.AS and SGLN.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | -0.09 |
The correlation between WFIN.AS and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (10 years) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
WFIN.AS
SGLN.L
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (WFIN.AS) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFIN.AS | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.75 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 4.51 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFIN.AS | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.28 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.21 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.88 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.57 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFIN.AS drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIN.AS and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFIN.AS | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.88% | -37.02% | -35.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -16.91% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.52% | -16.91% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.52% | -16.91% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.00% | -18.37% | -23.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -15.88% | +13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -13.26% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 6.57% | -3.45% |
Volatility
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (WFIN.AS) is 3.08%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that WFIN.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFIN.AS | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 5.01% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 20.20% | -10.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 23.20% | -10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 16.40% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 14.94% | +4.50% |
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFIN.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFIN.AS vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WFIN.AS nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WFIN.AS and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WFIN.AS.
WFIN.AS is categorized as Financials Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. WFIN.AS tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WFIN.AS and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for WFIN.AS and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer