PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFHY vs. IBHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFHY vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFHY achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 1.10% return.


WFHY

1D
0.05%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.74%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
8.17%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
4.96%

IBHG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFHY vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WFHY
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
1.51%9.61%5.92%10.12%-11.81%0.99%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.10%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between WFHY and IBHG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.84

The correlation between WFHY and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFHY vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFHY
WFHY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WFHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WFHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFHY vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFHYIBHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

6.51

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

23.87

-12.26

WFHY vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFHY and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHYIBHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.57

+0.05

Drawdowns

WFHY vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFHY and IBHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHYIBHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-13.85%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-0.73%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-3.39%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.09%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-2.67%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.20%

+0.41%

Volatility

WFHY vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.59%. This indicates that WFHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHYIBHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.59%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

1.53%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

2.11%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

6.36%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

6.36%

+1.84%

WFHY vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFHY vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

WFHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than IBHG's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.07%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFHY
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
6.25%6.26%6.40%6.11%5.44%4.09%4.80%5.21%5.93%6.47%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFHY and IBHG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFHY has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to IBHG (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFHY dropped -22.74% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

On 3-year performance, WFHY leads with 8.17% vs 7.53% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, WFHY has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WFHY.

WFHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.

WFHY tracks WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WFHY and 0.35% for IBHG.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFHY and IBHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer