PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFHY vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFHY vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFHY achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 11.25% return.


WFHY

1D
0.05%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.74%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
8.17%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
4.96%

GDE

1D
1.33%
1M
2.08%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
47.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFHY vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WFHY
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
1.51%9.61%5.92%10.12%-7.11%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
11.25%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between WFHY and GDE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.51

The correlation between WFHY and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFHY vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFHY
WFHY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WFHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WFHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFHY vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFHYGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.42

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

7.50

+4.11

WFHY vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFHY and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHYGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.93

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.17

-0.55

Drawdowns

WFHY vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFHY and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHYGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-32.01%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-22.66%

+19.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-22.66%

+18.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-9.99%

+9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-7.89%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

7.29%

-6.68%

Volatility

WFHY vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) is 1.07%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that WFHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHYGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

6.68%

-5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

24.27%

-21.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

28.41%

-24.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

26.12%

-18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

26.12%

-17.92%

WFHY vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFHY vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

WFHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than GDE's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.88%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFHY
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
6.25%6.26%6.40%6.11%5.44%4.09%4.80%5.21%5.93%6.47%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFHY and GDE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to WFHY (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFHY dropped -22.74% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 47.08% vs 8.17% for WFHY. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, WFHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.08% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WFHY.

WFHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 3.88% for GDE.

WFHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WFHY and 0.20% for GDE.

WFHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFHY and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer