WFHY vs. DADS
WFHY (WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. WFHY is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
WFHY vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFHY achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.38% return.
WFHY
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
DADS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WFHY vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WFHY WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 1.51% | 3.43% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.38% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFHY and DADS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFHY vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
WFHY
DADS
WFHY vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
WFHY vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFHY and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -17.07% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -2.77% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -7.61% | +4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility
WFHY vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 17.54% | -13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 17.54% | -9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 17.54% | -9.34% |
WFHY vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFHY vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
WFHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFHY WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 6.25% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFHY and DADS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WFHY is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WFHY is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
WFHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WFHY and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for WFHY and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer