WFEMX vs. GTDDX
WFEMX (WCM Focused Emerging Markets Fund) and GTDDX (Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, WFEMX returned 11.10%/yr vs 10.50%/yr for GTDDX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WFEMX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for GTDDX.
Performance
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFEMX achieves a 29.51% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 49.56% return. Over the past 10 years, WFEMX has outperformed GTDDX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while GTDDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.50% annualized return.
WFEMX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 29.51%
- 6M
- 31.23%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
GTDDX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 11.61%
- YTD
- 49.56%
- 6M
- 53.96%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFEMX WCM Focused Emerging Markets Fund | 29.51% | 31.13% | 9.81% | 4.25% | -30.86% | -1.94% | 36.15% | 37.44% | -12.71% | 40.94% |
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd | 49.56% | 29.88% | -0.66% | 8.82% | -17.70% | -7.00% | 17.19% | 29.99% | -18.77% | 30.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFEMX and GTDDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2013 | 0.85 |
The correlation between WFEMX and GTDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFEMX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank
WFEMX
GTDDX
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused Emerging Markets Fund (WFEMX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFEMX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.66 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 5.41 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 20.42 | -6.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFEMX drawdown since its inception was -46.28%, smaller than the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFEMX and GTDDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFEMX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.28% | -62.89% | +16.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -14.49% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -16.08% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.91% | -36.93% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.28% | -39.58% | -6.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -18.73% | +3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.82% | -0.23% |
Volatility
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WCM Focused Emerging Markets Fund (WFEMX) is 10.69%, while Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that WFEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFEMX | GTDDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 11.53% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | 19.27% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.24% | 21.50% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 16.92% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 17.15% | +1.80% |
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFEMX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFEMX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison
WFEMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd | 14.13% | 21.13% | 1.16% | 1.51% | 1.17% | 4.46% | 5.05% | 1.49% | 1.53% | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.99% |
WFEMX WCM Focused Emerging Markets Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.32% | 4.42% | 0.88% | 0.37% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFEMX and GTDDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTDDX has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to WFEMX (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFEMX dropped -46.28% vs GTDDX's -62.89%.
GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFEMX and GTDDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer