WFEAX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WFEAX (Allspring International Equity Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, WFEAX returned 16.11%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WFEAX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring International Equity Fund (WFEAX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFEAX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.

WFEAX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 13.50%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: 7.37%

LIAGX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 10.09%
• YTD: 27.78%
• 6M: 28.66%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WFEAX Allspring International Equity Fund	10.60%	30.47%	0.07%	15.57%	-11.56%	-4.41%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	27.78%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between WFEAX and LIAGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021	0.82

The correlation between WFEAX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WFEAX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFEAX

WFEAX Risk / Return Rank: 21
WFEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
WFEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
WFEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WFEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
WFEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 48
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring International Equity Fund (WFEAX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WFEAX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.99	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.71	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.82	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.02	11.32	-5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFEAX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFEAX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	1.99	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.45	-0.21

Drawdowns

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFEAX drawdown since its inception was -60.66%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFEAX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFEAX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.66%	-37.87%	-22.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.47%	-14.56%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.13%	-17.11%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.61%	-13.24%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	3.62%	-0.29%

Volatility

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring International Equity Fund (WFEAX) is 4.76%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that WFEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFEAX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	8.29%	-3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	18.01%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.15%	20.68%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	18.79%	-3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.68%	18.79%	-2.11%

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFEAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

WFEAX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

WFEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WFEAX Allspring International Equity Fund	1.67%	1.73%	2.47%	1.95%	2.24%	1.61%	0.68%	2.11%	3.37%	3.34%	2.95%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WFEAX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

WFEAX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WFEAX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to WFEAX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFEAX dropped -60.66% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.