PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WESWX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WESWX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETON Westwood Equity Fund (WESWX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, WESWX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


WESWX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.96%
YTD
5.17%
6M
4.97%
1Y
10.78%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
8.71%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WESWX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WESWX
TETON Westwood Equity Fund
5.17%5.14%9.72%7.48%-7.14%22.02%2.33%26.97%-6.41%20.40%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WESWX and FALIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between WESWX and FALIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WESWX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WESWX
WESWX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WESWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WESWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
WESWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WESWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WESWX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WESWX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETON Westwood Equity Fund (WESWX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WESWXFALIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.49

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.89

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

4.92

+1.17

WESWX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WESWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WESWX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WESWXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.81

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.78

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.77

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Drawdowns

WESWX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WESWX drawdown since its inception was -52.38%, smaller than the maximum FALIX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WESWX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WESWXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.38%

-62.37%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-5.03%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.99%

-18.89%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.50%

-21.48%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-37.51%

+1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-4.17%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-13.28%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.78%

-0.91%

Volatility

WESWX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

TETON Westwood Equity Fund (WESWX) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that WESWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WESWXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

0.00%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

4.20%

+3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

8.06%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

16.44%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

18.58%

-2.24%

WESWX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WESWX has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

WESWX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

WESWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, more than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
WESWX
TETON Westwood Equity Fund
14.06%14.79%8.77%5.06%7.60%17.92%4.55%9.75%18.19%11.70%7.11%8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


WESWX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WESWX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WESWX dropped -52.38% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

FALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WESWX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer