PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WENS.L vs. SXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WENS.L is traded in GBP, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WENS.L having a 31.38% return and SXLE.L slightly lower at 31.04%.


WENS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
31.38%
6M
26.68%
1Y
44.00%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*

SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
31.04%
6M
28.53%
1Y
47.78%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
31.38%3.24%2.09%-2.00%17.73%
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
31.04%1.92%5.56%-4.41%22.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WENS.L and SXLE.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022

0.94

The correlation between WENS.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WENS.LSXLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.86

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

8.85

+0.81

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WENS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WENS.L and SXLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WENS.LSXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.06

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.40

+0.19

Drawdowns

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WENS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, smaller than the maximum SXLE.L drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WENS.L and SXLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WENS.LSXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-62.09%

+39.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-16.65%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.49%

-23.84%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-9.06%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-15.52%

+6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

5.38%

-0.84%

Volatility

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) is 7.96%, while State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that WENS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WENS.LSXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

8.66%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

19.47%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

23.18%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

26.52%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.49%

28.35%

-6.86%

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WENS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WENS.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WENS.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


WENS.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.

WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WENS.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WENS.L and SXLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer