WENS.L vs. IESU.L
WENS.L (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds from iShares - WENS.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while IESU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WENS.L returned 14.89%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for IESU.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WENS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WENS.L is traded in GBP, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WENS.L achieves a 27.02% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 28.61% return.
WENS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- YTD
- 27.02%
- 1Y
- 35.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IESU.L
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- YTD
- 28.61%
- 1Y
- 35.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 27.02% | 6.73% | 3.85% | -2.00% | 17.73% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.61% | 2.26% | 5.45% | -5.96% | 21.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between WENS.L and IESU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between WENS.L and IESU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WENS.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
WENS.L
IESU.L
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WENS.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.07 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 5.01 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WENS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -63.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WENS.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WENS.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.15% | -63.88% | +42.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -17.34% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -26.36% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.69% | -10.65% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -20.50% | +11.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 7.16% | -0.92% |
Volatility
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) is 6.40%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that WENS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WENS.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 7.50% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.36% | 21.74% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.05% | 24.54% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 29.08% | -7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 29.16% | -7.59% |
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WENS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WENS.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
WENS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while IESU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.71% | 3.25% | 3.52% | 3.61% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, WENS.L and IESU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.
WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WENS.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for WENS.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer