WENS.L vs. ESIE.L
WENS.L (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ESIE.L (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WENS.L returned 13.87%/yr vs 17.82%/yr for ESIE.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WENS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIE.L.
Performance
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WENS.L achieves a 31.38% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.L's 34.22% return.
WENS.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 31.38%
- 6M
- 26.68%
- 1Y
- 44.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIE.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 34.22%
- 6M
- 30.17%
- 1Y
- 59.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- —
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 31.38% | 3.24% | 2.09% | -2.00% | 17.73% |
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 34.22% | 20.13% | -9.70% | 6.04% | 16.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between WENS.L and ESIE.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between WENS.L and ESIE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L — Risk / Return Rank
WENS.L
ESIE.L
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WENS.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 4.87 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 14.82 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WENS.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.58 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.86 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WENS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, smaller than the maximum ESIE.L drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WENS.L and ESIE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WENS.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.49% | -27.35% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -12.13% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.49% | -27.35% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -6.99% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -8.23% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 3.99% | +0.55% |
Volatility
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) have volatilities of 7.96% and 8.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WENS.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 8.04% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.19% | 19.18% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 22.92% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 24.32% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 24.58% | -3.09% |
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WENS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WENS.L vs. ESIE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WENS.L nor ESIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 3.61% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WENS.L and ESIE.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WENS.L and 0.18% for ESIE.L.
Find the right allocation for WENS.L and ESIE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer