PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WENS.L vs. ENGY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WENS.L is traded in GBP, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WENS.L having a 27.03% return and ENGY.L slightly lower at 26.40%.


WENS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.21%
6M
20.22%
YTD
27.03%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
10Y*

ENGY.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
0.19%
6M
23.38%
YTD
26.40%
1Y
37.62%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
27.03%6.73%3.85%-2.00%17.73%
ENGY.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
26.40%20.09%-9.05%5.80%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WENS.L and ENGY.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.83

The correlation between WENS.L and ENGY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ENGY.L
ENGY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WENS.LENGY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.93

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

5.98

-0.37

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WENS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WENS.L and ENGY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WENS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum ENGY.L drawdown of -56.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WENS.L and ENGY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WENS.LENGY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-56.13%

+34.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-19.35%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-26.58%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.68%

-12.32%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-12.24%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

6.27%

-0.11%

Volatility

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) is 6.27%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that WENS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WENS.LENGY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

7.35%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

20.13%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

23.15%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

23.60%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

25.69%

-4.13%

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WENS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WENS.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison

WENS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while ENGY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ENGY.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.71%3.25%3.52%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


WENS.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENGY.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENGY.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WENS.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WENS.L and ENGY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer