WEMMX vs. FCDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX).
WEMMX is managed by Teton Westwood. It was launched on May 11, 1998. FCDAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007.
Performance
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 4.76% | 11.02% | 3.83% | 13.53% | -15.37% | 21.44% | 10.02% | 16.94% | -13.69% | 15.47% |
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.32% | 14.04% | 14.16% | 19.09% | -18.47% | 24.38% | 21.39% | 30.05% | -9.16% | 11.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEMMX achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than FCDAX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WEMMX has underperformed FCDAX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while FCDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.
WEMMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
FCDAX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEMMX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FCDAX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WEMMX vs. FCDAX — Risk / Return Rank
WEMMX
FCDAX
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEMMX | FCDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.73 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.69 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 7.20 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEMMX | FCDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.33 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.52 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.31 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between WEMMX and FCDAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Dividend Comparison
WEMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than FCDAX's 0.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 21.77% | 22.80% | 26.79% | 18.86% | 13.60% | 15.44% | 9.23% | 4.11% | 4.16% | 6.44% | 4.61% | 2.35% |
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.44% | 0.44% | 2.61% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 10.93% | 1.44% | 1.96% | 22.71% | 10.34% | 1.43% | 6.93% |
Drawdowns
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEMMX drawdown since its inception was -42.48%, smaller than the maximum FCDAX drawdown of -65.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEMMX and FCDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEMMX | FCDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.48% | -65.62% | +23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -13.83% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.11% | -30.67% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.73% | -38.46% | -3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.04% | -9.85% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -12.23% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.25% | +0.35% |
Volatility
WEMMX vs. FCDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) is 5.84%, while Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that WEMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WEMMX | FCDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 6.87% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 12.99% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 22.16% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 21.54% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 21.78% | -1.42% |