WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WELY.DE (Amundi S&P Global Financials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and XDWF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Financials Equities funds - WELY.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Financials while XDWF.DE tracks the MSCI World Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELY.DE returned 21.58%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for XDWF.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WELY.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWF.DE.

Performance

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Financials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELY.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELY.DE achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than XDWF.DE's 1.15% return.

WELY.DE

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 6.08%
• 1Y: 13.80%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDWF.DE

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 20.89%
• 5Y*: 12.85%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WELY.DE Amundi S&P Global Financials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist	1.63%	17.51%	33.70%	12.61%	9.80%
XDWF.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C	1.15%	15.35%	34.08%	12.42%	5.45%

Correlation

The correlation between WELY.DE and XDWF.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022	0.98

The correlation between WELY.DE and XDWF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELY.DE

WELY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 29
WELY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
WELY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WELY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 26
WELY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WELY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

XDWF.DE

XDWF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 27
XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
XDWF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XDWF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 25
XDWF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XDWF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Financials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELY.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WELY.DE	XDWF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.93	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	1.40	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.16	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.29	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	3.98	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELY.DE and XDWF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WELY.DE	XDWF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.93	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.63	+0.73

Drawdowns

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELY.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.85%, smaller than the maximum XDWF.DE drawdown of -42.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELY.DE and XDWF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELY.DE	XDWF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.85%	-42.06%	+22.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.52%	-9.65%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.85%	-19.74%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.84%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-6.06%	+2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	3.14%	-0.08%

Volatility

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P Global Financials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELY.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) have volatilities of 3.50% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELY.DE	XDWF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	3.37%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.32%	10.03%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	13.39%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	16.25%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	18.61%	-3.66%

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELY.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWF.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WELY.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Dividend Comparison

WELY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while XDWF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WELY.DE Amundi S&P Global Financials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist	2.11%	2.01%	1.54%	0.25%
XDWF.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELY.DE and XDWF.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, WELY.DE and XDWF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WELY.DE or XDWF.DE?

On fees, WELY.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELY.DE or XDWF.DE?

WELY.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWF.DE.

What is the main difference between WELY.DE and XDWF.DE?

WELY.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Financials, while XDWF.DE tracks MSCI World Financials. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELY.DE and 0.25% for XDWF.DE.