PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELS.DE achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly lower than GN0M.DE's 12.99% return.


WELS.DE

1D
2.97%
1M
4.14%
YTD
-3.35%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
10Y*

GN0M.DE

1D
5.61%
1M
13.54%
YTD
12.99%
6M
10.44%
1Y
55.70%
3Y*
-1.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WELS.DE
Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-3.35%1.05%7.20%2.33%4.02%
GN0M.DE
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
12.99%5.67%-12.40%-9.04%-6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between WELS.DE and GN0M.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.44

The correlation between WELS.DE and GN0M.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELS.DE
WELS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WELS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GN0M.DE
GN0M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GN0M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GN0M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GN0M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GN0M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GN0M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WELS.DEGN0M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.32

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

8.35

-7.06

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the GN0M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELS.DE and GN0M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WELS.DEGN0M.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

2.00

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.34

+0.56

Drawdowns

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.13%, smaller than the maximum GN0M.DE drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELS.DE and GN0M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELS.DEGN0M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-67.19%

+44.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-16.68%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.13%

-48.32%

+25.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.08%

-41.03%

+28.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-43.13%

+35.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

6.65%

-1.31%

Volatility

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) is 5.27%, while Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GN0M.DE) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that WELS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GN0M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELS.DEGN0M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

8.15%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

19.69%

-9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

27.68%

-13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

31.49%

-17.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.59%

31.49%

-17.90%

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELS.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GN0M.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

WELS.DE vs. GN0M.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WELS.DE nor GN0M.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WELS.DE and GN0M.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WELS.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELS.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GN0M.DE.

WELS.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care, while GN0M.DE tracks Solactive Genomics. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELS.DE and 0.50% for GN0M.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELS.DE and GN0M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer