WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WELN.DE (Amundi S&P Global Energy Carbon Reduced UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - WELN.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Energy while XDW0.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELN.DE returned 14.42%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for XDW0.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WELN.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.

Performance

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Energy Carbon Reduced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WELN.DE having a 33.78% return and XDW0.DE slightly lower at 32.75%.

WELN.DE

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 33.78%
• 6M: 30.26%
• 1Y: 43.28%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDW0.DE

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 32.75%
• 6M: 28.86%
• 1Y: 45.88%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 20.33%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WELN.DE Amundi S&P Global Energy Carbon Reduced UCITS ETF EUR Acc	33.78%	-1.37%	8.67%	-0.46%	6.24%
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C	32.75%	2.24%	7.48%	0.18%	0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WELN.DE and XDW0.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022	0.95

The correlation between WELN.DE and XDW0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELN.DE

WELN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
WELN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
WELN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
WELN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
WELN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
WELN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

XDW0.DE

XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 59
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Energy Carbon Reduced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WELN.DE	XDW0.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.10	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.58	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	2.98	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.82	9.92	+1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELN.DE and XDW0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WELN.DE	XDW0.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.10	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.37	+0.24

Drawdowns

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.29%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -61.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELN.DE and XDW0.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELN.DE	XDW0.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.29%	-61.44%	+38.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.35%	-15.05%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.29%	-23.71%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.95%	-7.38%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-13.84%	+5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	4.53%	-0.93%

Volatility

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Energy Carbon Reduced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELN.DE) is 6.50%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that WELN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELN.DE	XDW0.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.50%	6.96%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.38%	18.42%	-2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.61%	21.48%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.90%	24.04%	-4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	26.02%	-6.12%

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELN.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WELN.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WELN.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELN.DE and XDW0.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, WELN.DE and XDW0.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WELN.DE or XDW0.DE?

On fees, WELN.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELN.DE or XDW0.DE?

WELN.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

What is the main difference between WELN.DE and XDW0.DE?

WELN.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Energy, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELN.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.