PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELL vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WELL vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 265.92% return. Over the past 10 years, WELL has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 15.02%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.83% annualized return.


WELL

1D
0.05%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
12.11%
6M
11.87%
1Y
38.74%
3Y*
39.84%
5Y*
24.38%
10Y*
15.02%

MRVL

1D
7.27%
1M
58.19%
YTD
265.92%
6M
269.79%
1Y
323.64%
3Y*
72.50%
5Y*
42.30%
10Y*
41.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELL vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WELL
Welltower Inc.
12.11%49.86%43.07%41.79%-21.18%36.98%-17.19%23.04%15.31%0.22%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
265.92%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WELL and MRVL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.20

The correlation between WELL and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WELL:

$150.08B

MRVL:

$277.44B

EPS

WELL:

$2.02

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

WELL:

102.40

MRVL:

107.24

PEG Ratio

WELL:

2.27

MRVL:

0.20

PS Ratio

WELL:

12.39

MRVL:

31.08

PB Ratio

WELL:

3.43

MRVL:

15.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

WELL:

$11.63B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WELL:

$3.25B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

WELL:

$3.00B

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELL vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELL
WELL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELL vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WELLMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.56

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

12.06

-9.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

27.45

-20.25

WELL vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WELL vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELLMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.33%

-91.60%

+28.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-26.36%

+13.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-60.79%

+47.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-61.88%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.33%

-61.88%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-1.85%

-4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-46.72%

+36.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

11.56%

-6.41%

Volatility

WELL vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Welltower Inc. (WELL) is 9.50%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 42.59%. This indicates that WELL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELLMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

42.59%

-33.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

57.08%

-40.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

72.48%

-50.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

62.25%

-38.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.91%

52.18%

-20.27%

Dividends

WELL vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than MRVL's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
1.43%1.52%2.03%2.71%3.72%2.84%4.18%4.26%5.01%5.46%5.14%4.85%

Financials

WELL vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Welltower Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
3.35B
2.42B
(WELL) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WELL vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Welltower Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
52.2%
Portfolio components
WELL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

WELL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported an operating income of 752.32M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

WELL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a net income of 728.67M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WELL and MRVL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (42.59%) compared to WELL (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WELL dropped -63.33% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELL and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer