PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELL vs. AOO.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WELL vs. AOO.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Aedifica NV/SA (AOO.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WELL is traded in USD, while AOO.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AOO.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than AOO.F's 5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WELL has outperformed AOO.F with an annualized return of 14.83%, while AOO.F has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.


WELL

1D
-3.35%
1M
-6.50%
YTD
8.50%
6M
0.26%
1Y
31.48%
3Y*
37.93%
5Y*
23.47%
10Y*
14.83%

AOO.F

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
5.03%
6M
8.91%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
-4.37%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELL vs. AOO.F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WELL
Welltower Inc.
8.50%49.86%43.07%41.79%-21.18%36.98%-17.19%23.04%15.31%0.22%
AOO.F
Aedifica NV/SA
5.03%43.64%-15.95%-5.31%-35.33%10.54%2.05%57.97%2.36%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WELL and AOO.F is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007

0.19

The correlation between WELL and AOO.F shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELL vs. AOO.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELL
WELL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AOO.F
AOO.F Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AOO.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOO.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOO.F Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AOO.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOO.F Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELL vs. AOO.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Aedifica NV/SA (AOO.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WELLAOO.FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

0.54

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

1.37

+4.84

WELL vs. AOO.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the AOO.F Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL and AOO.F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WELLAOO.FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.40

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

-0.16

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.26

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.18

+0.37

Drawdowns

WELL vs. AOO.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, roughly equal to the maximum AOO.F drawdown of -61.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and AOO.F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELLAOO.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.33%

-61.81%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-15.32%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-29.79%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-61.81%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.33%

-61.81%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-31.97%

+22.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-20.31%

+9.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

5.99%

-0.89%

Volatility

WELL vs. AOO.F - Volatility Comparison

Welltower Inc. (WELL) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Aedifica NV/SA (AOO.F) at 7.17%. This indicates that WELL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOO.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELLAOO.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

7.17%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.08%

16.45%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.48%

21.38%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

27.08%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.88%

26.12%

+5.76%

Dividends

WELL vs. AOO.F - Dividend Comparison

WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than AOO.F's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOO.F
Aedifica NV/SA
5.97%5.83%3.38%5.76%4.82%1.82%4.01%5.07%6.70%2.81%2.95%6.91%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
1.48%1.52%2.03%2.71%3.72%2.84%4.18%4.26%5.01%5.46%5.14%4.85%

Financials

WELL vs. AOO.F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Welltower Inc. and Aedifica NV/SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. WELL values in USD, AOO.F values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


WELL and AOO.F have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELL and AOO.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer