WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Vitalhub Corp. (VHI.TO).

Performance

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Vitalhub Corp. (VHI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WELL.TO WELL Health Technologies Corp.	-2.51%	-41.84%	78.18%	35.56%	-42.16%	-34.79%
VHI.TO Vitalhub Corp.	-26.29%	-15.97%	176.23%	53.96%	-19.70%	10.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WELL.TO : CA$586.52M VHI.TO : CA$440.26M
EPS WELL.TO : -CA$0.03 VHI.TO : CA$0.10
PS Ratio WELL.TO : 0.62 VHI.TO : 3.90
PB Ratio WELL.TO : 0.68 VHI.TO : 1.66
Total Revenue (TTM) WELL.TO : CA$1.40B VHI.TO : CA$108.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) WELL.TO : CA$525.08M VHI.TO : CA$84.13M
EBITDA (TTM) WELL.TO : CA$161.38M VHI.TO : CA$20.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELL.TO achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than VHI.TO's -26.29% return.

WELL.TO

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -7.38%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: -26.88%
• 1Y: -10.16%
• 3Y*: -7.15%
• 5Y*: -12.02%
• 10Y*: 69.39%

VHI.TO

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -15.50%
• YTD: -26.29%
• 6M: -37.00%
• 1Y: -30.69%
• 3Y*: 40.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELL.TO

WELL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 31
WELL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
WELL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
WELL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 27
WELL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
WELL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

VHI.TO

VHI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 14
VHI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
VHI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
VHI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
VHI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
VHI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Vitalhub Corp. (VHI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WELL.TO	VHI.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	-0.80	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	-1.05	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.88	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	-0.62	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	-1.20	+0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is higher than the VHI.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL.TO and VHI.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WELL.TO	VHI.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	-0.80	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.54	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between WELL.TO and VHI.TO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither WELL.TO nor VHI.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, which is greater than VHI.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.TO and VHI.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELL.TO	VHI.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.33%	-51.43%	-46.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.43%	-51.43%	+12.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.85%	-50.00%	-7.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.16%	-15.27%	-30.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.96%	26.50%	-4.54%

Volatility

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Volatility Comparison

WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to Vitalhub Corp. (VHI.TO) at 12.64%. This indicates that WELL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELL.TO	VHI.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.47%	12.64%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.47%	27.70%	+3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.85%	39.12%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.65%	38.40%	+7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	159.86%	38.40%	+121.46%

Financials

WELL.TO vs. VHI.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WELL Health Technologies Corp. and Vitalhub Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WELL.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported a gross profit of 109.62M and revenue of 384.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

VHI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Vitalhub Corp. reported a gross profit of 21.45M and revenue of 31.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.3%.

WELL.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported an operating income of 44.96M and revenue of 384.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

VHI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Vitalhub Corp. reported an operating income of 3.79M and revenue of 31.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

WELL.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported a net income of 22.89M and revenue of 384.77M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

VHI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Vitalhub Corp. reported a net income of 4.07M and revenue of 31.39M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.