PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WELL.TO vs. BGFV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


WELL.TOBGFV
YTD Return30.39%-71.32%
1Y Return32.45%-66.50%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.70%-59.97%
5Y Return (Ann)29.63%-1.87%
10Y Return (Ann)64.70%-12.85%
Sharpe Ratio0.35-1.00
Sortino Ratio0.82-1.60
Omega Ratio1.110.80
Calmar Ratio0.25-0.69
Martin Ratio1.71-1.28
Ulcer Index9.15%51.45%
Daily Std Dev44.44%66.01%
Max Drawdown-98.33%-95.96%
Current Drawdown-45.61%-94.86%

Fundamentals


WELL.TOBGFV
Market CapCA$1.27B$40.86M
EPSCA$0.31-$2.61
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$705.96M$810.20M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$276.58M$242.57M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$82.21M-$35.05M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between WELL.TO and BGFV is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WELL.TO achieves a 30.39% return, which is significantly higher than BGFV's -71.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WELL.TO has outperformed BGFV with an annualized return of 64.70%, while BGFV has yielded a comparatively lower -12.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
25.96%
-47.72%
WELL.TO
BGFV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (BGFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WELL.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WELL.TO, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WELL.TO, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WELL.TO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WELL.TO, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WELL.TO, currently valued at 3.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.22
BGFV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BGFV, currently valued at -1.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BGFV, currently valued at -1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BGFV, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.79
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BGFV, currently valued at -0.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BGFV, currently valued at -1.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.30

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the BGFV Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL.TO and BGFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.72
-1.02
WELL.TO
BGFV

Dividends

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Dividend Comparison

WELL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.71%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
WELL.TO
WELL Health Technologies Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation
12.71%13.80%11.33%14.89%2.45%6.67%19.31%7.89%3.03%4.00%2.73%2.02%

Drawdowns

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BGFV drawdown of -95.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.TO and BGFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-51.59%
-94.86%
WELL.TO
BGFV

Volatility

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) is 16.36%, while Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (BGFV) has a volatility of 19.86%. This indicates that WELL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.36%
19.86%
WELL.TO
BGFV

Financials

WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WELL Health Technologies Corp. and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. WELL.TO values in CAD, BGFV values in USD