WELL.TO vs. BGFV
WELL.TO (WELL Health Technologies Corp.) and BGFV (Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation) are both stocks. WELL.TO operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while BGFV operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WELL.TO is traded in CAD, while BGFV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BGFV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
WELL.TO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 12.06%
- YTD
- 21.05%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -7.60%
- 10Y*
- 44.70%
BGFV
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WELL.TO WELL Health Technologies Corp. | 19.26% |
BGFV Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL.TO and BGFV is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | -0.16 |
Fundamentals
WELL.TO:
CA$1.23B
BGFV:
$31.91M
WELL.TO:
CA$0.12
BGFV:
-$4.18
WELL.TO:
0.75
BGFV:
0.04
WELL.TO:
1.42
BGFV:
0.24
WELL.TO:
CA$1.47B
BGFV:
$762.76M
WELL.TO:
CA$545.21M
BGFV:
$221.87M
WELL.TO:
CA$219.35M
BGFV:
-$56.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL.TO vs. BGFV — Risk / Return Rank
WELL.TO
BGFV
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (BGFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.31 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, which is greater than BGFV's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.TO and BGFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.33% | -2.45% | -95.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.67% | -0.19% | -47.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.27% | -0.88% | -45.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.96% | — | — |
Volatility
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.32% | 4.29% | +37.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.60% | 4.29% | +41.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.63% | 4.29% | +63.34% |
Dividends
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Dividend Comparison
Neither WELL.TO nor BGFV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WELL Health Technologies Corp. and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Profitability Comparison
WELL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported a gross profit of 137.60M and revenue of 368.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.4%.
BGFV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation reported a gross profit of 52.17M and revenue of 184.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
WELL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported an operating income of 19.76M and revenue of 368.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
BGFV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation reported an operating income of -23.20M and revenue of 184.89M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.6%.
WELL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported a net income of -12.38M and revenue of 368.26M, resulting in a net margin of -3.4%.
BGFV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation reported a net income of -24.54M and revenue of 184.89M, resulting in a net margin of -13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WELL.TO and BGFV have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WELL.TO and BGFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer