WELL.TO vs. BGFV
Compare and contrast key facts about WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (BGFV).
Performance
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WELL.TO WELL Health Technologies Corp. | -5.19% |
BGFV Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation | 1.73% |
Different Trading Currencies
WELL.TO is traded in CAD, while BGFV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BGFV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
WELL.TO:
CA$578.98M
BGFV:
$31.91M
WELL.TO:
-CA$0.03
BGFV:
-$4.18
WELL.TO:
0.61
BGFV:
0.04
WELL.TO:
0.67
BGFV:
0.24
WELL.TO:
CA$1.40B
BGFV:
$762.76M
WELL.TO:
CA$525.08M
BGFV:
$221.87M
WELL.TO:
CA$161.38M
BGFV:
-$56.85M
Returns By Period
WELL.TO
- 1D
- 5.49%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -3.76%
- 6M
- -25.29%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- -7.55%
- 5Y*
- -12.25%
- 10Y*
- 69.17%
BGFV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL.TO vs. BGFV — Risk / Return Rank
WELL.TO
BGFV
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WELL Health Technologies Corp. (WELL.TO) and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (BGFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 3.11 | -2.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL.TO and BGFV is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Dividend Comparison
Neither WELL.TO nor BGFV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.33%, which is greater than BGFV's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.TO and BGFV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.33% | 0.00% | -98.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.40% | 0.00% | -58.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.15% | 0.00% | -46.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.84% | — | — |
Volatility
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WELL.TO | BGFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.04% | 4.74% | +40.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.67% | 4.74% | +40.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.89% | 4.74% | +155.15% |
Financials
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WELL Health Technologies Corp. and Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WELL.TO vs. BGFV - Profitability Comparison
WELL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported a gross profit of 109.62M and revenue of 384.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.
BGFV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation reported a gross profit of 52.17M and revenue of 184.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
WELL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported an operating income of 44.96M and revenue of 384.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
BGFV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation reported an operating income of -23.20M and revenue of 184.89M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.6%.
WELL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WELL Health Technologies Corp. reported a net income of 22.89M and revenue of 384.77M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
BGFV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation reported a net income of -24.54M and revenue of 184.89M, resulting in a net margin of -13.3%.