WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE
WELL.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and ZPDT.DE (SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WELL.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology while ZPDT.DE tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELL.DE returned 27.36%/yr vs 26.33%/yr for ZPDT.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WELL.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZPDT.DE.
Performance
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELL.DE achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDT.DE's 24.09% return.
WELL.DE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 21.22%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 44.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPDT.DE
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 24.09%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 49.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.38%
- 10Y*
- 24.05%
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 21.22% | 9.77% | 38.81% | 57.34% | 0.14% |
ZPDT.DE SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 24.09% | 11.31% | 29.30% | 52.02% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL.DE and ZPDT.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between WELL.DE and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELL.DE
ZPDT.DE
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELL.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.19 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 8.35 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELL.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.43 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 1.03 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum ZPDT.DE drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.DE and ZPDT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -31.48% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -15.47% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.78% | -29.50% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -3.09% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -5.68% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 5.91% | +0.35% |
Volatility
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) have volatilities of 6.79% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELL.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 7.06% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | 14.78% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 20.30% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 22.33% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 21.38% | +0.82% |
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELL.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WELL.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison
WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while ZPDT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.14% |
ZPDT.DE SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, WELL.DE and ZPDT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELL.DE.
WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELL.DE and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELL.DE and ZPDT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer