WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE
WELL.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WELL.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology while XMLD.DE tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELL.DE returned 27.36%/yr vs 33.99%/yr for XMLD.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WELL.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLD.DE.
Performance
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELL.DE achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than XMLD.DE's 42.18% return.
WELL.DE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 21.22%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 44.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 20.65%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 39.73%
- 1Y
- 73.37%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- —
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 21.22% | 9.77% | 38.81% | 57.34% | 0.14% |
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 42.18% | 16.99% | 25.17% | 54.28% | -4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL.DE and XMLD.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between WELL.DE and XMLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELL.DE
XMLD.DE
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELL.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.62 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 12.52 | -5.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELL.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.76 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.82 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum XMLD.DE drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.DE and XMLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -42.81% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -15.80% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.78% | -33.67% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -2.30% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -13.51% | +8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 5.84% | +0.42% |
Volatility
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) is 6.79%, while L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that WELL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELL.DE | XMLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 10.34% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | 19.89% | -5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 26.47% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 27.22% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 28.52% | -6.32% |
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELL.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XMLD.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WELL.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while XMLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.14% |
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WELL.DE and XMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELL.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELL.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.
WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology, while XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELL.DE and 0.49% for XMLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELL.DE and XMLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer