WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE
WELL.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and ETLH.DE (L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WELL.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology while ETLH.DE tracks the Solactive eCommerce Logistics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELL.DE returned 27.36%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for ETLH.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WELL.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ETLH.DE.
Performance
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELL.DE achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly higher than ETLH.DE's 0.49% return.
WELL.DE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 21.22%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 44.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLH.DE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 21.22% | 9.77% | 38.81% | 57.34% | 0.14% |
ETLH.DE L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.49% | -0.43% | 8.79% | 17.72% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELL.DE and ETLH.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.59 |
The correlation between WELL.DE and ETLH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELL.DE
ETLH.DE
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) and L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELL.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.06 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 0.37 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 0.96 | +6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELL.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 0.32 | +1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.56 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELL.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLH.DE drawdown of -27.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL.DE and ETLH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELL.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -27.60% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -12.61% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.78% | -25.70% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -7.50% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -8.28% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 4.89% | +1.37% |
Volatility
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) at 4.00%. This indicates that WELL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELL.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 4.00% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | 10.62% | +4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 14.85% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 16.60% | +5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 17.49% | +4.71% |
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELL.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ETLH.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WELL.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Dividend Comparison
WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while ETLH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLH.DE L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WELL.DE and ETLH.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELL.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELL.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ETLH.DE.
WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology, while ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELL.DE and 0.49% for ETLH.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELL.DE and ETLH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer