PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELG.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELG.DE achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.


WELG.DE

1D
2.97%
1M
3.72%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-3.07%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
10Y*

LSMC.DE

1D
-3.34%
1M
12.86%
YTD
63.83%
6M
63.41%
1Y
126.99%
3Y*
62.06%
5Y*
36.20%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WELG.DE
Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-3.60%1.26%7.51%1.94%4.13%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
63.83%32.60%66.54%74.46%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WELG.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.14

The correlation between WELG.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELG.DE
WELG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WELG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELG.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WELG.DELSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.59

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

10.37

-9.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

32.83

-31.54

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELG.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WELG.DELSMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

4.27

-3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.82

-0.60

Drawdowns

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELG.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELG.DE and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELG.DELSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-39.77%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-12.53%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.11%

-36.22%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.09%

-3.34%

-8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-9.37%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

3.96%

+1.38%

Volatility

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELG.DE) is 5.31%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that WELG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELG.DELSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

11.23%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

22.18%

-11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

30.40%

-15.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

31.21%

-17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

26.06%

-12.57%

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELG.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WELG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

WELG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELG.DE
Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
1.55%1.36%0.92%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


WELG.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WELG.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELG.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

WELG.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. WELG.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELG.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELG.DE and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer