PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELD.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Utilities UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELD.DE achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than EXH9.DE's 12.41% return.


WELD.DE

1D
-1.00%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.19%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
10Y*

EXH9.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
12.41%
6M
14.24%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WELD.DE
Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
6.78%18.60%10.09%1.57%9.15%
EXH9.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Utilities UCITS ETF (DE)
12.41%33.92%1.25%13.58%15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WELD.DE and EXH9.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.78

The correlation between WELD.DE and EXH9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELD.DE
WELD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
WELD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EXH9.DE
EXH9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EXH9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXH9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXH9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EXH9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXH9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELD.DE) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Utilities UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WELD.DEEXH9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.44

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

9.54

-3.07

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the EXH9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELD.DE and EXH9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WELD.DEEXH9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.74

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.42

+0.52

Drawdowns

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELD.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum EXH9.DE drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELD.DE and EXH9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELD.DEEXH9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-51.33%

+37.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-7.45%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-13.67%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-5.32%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-16.67%

+13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.69%

-0.26%

Volatility

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELD.DE) is 4.02%, while iShares STOXX Europe 600 Utilities UCITS ETF (DE) (EXH9.DE) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that WELD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXH9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELD.DEEXH9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

5.89%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

12.89%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

14.75%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

16.00%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.35%

17.03%

-3.68%

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELD.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EXH9.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

WELD.DE vs. EXH9.DE - Dividend Comparison

WELD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXH9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXH9.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Utilities UCITS ETF (DE)
2.61%2.96%3.27%3.47%3.33%3.11%2.36%3.41%3.31%6.56%4.89%4.62%
WELD.DE
Amundi S&P Global Utilities ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WELD.DE and EXH9.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WELD.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WELD.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EXH9.DE.

WELD.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Utilities, while EXH9.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Utilities. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELD.DE and 0.47% for EXH9.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELD.DE and EXH9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer