PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBS vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEBS vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -11.73% return, which is significantly lower than ESGV's 10.61% return.


WEBS

1D
4.75%
1M
-3.57%
6M
-16.73%
YTD
-11.73%
1Y
-16.44%
3Y*
-44.25%
5Y*
-33.85%
10Y*

ESGV

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.67%
6M
9.51%
YTD
10.61%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBS vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
-11.73%-40.66%-56.62%-75.58%117.15%-39.82%-87.18%-10.90%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.61%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBS and ESGV is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

-0.84

The correlation between WEBS and ESGV shifts across timeframes, from -0.86 (5 years) to -0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBS vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBS
WEBS Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WEBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBS vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEBSESGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.28

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

1.87

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

7.68

-8.37

WEBS vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBS and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEBS vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than ESGV's maximum drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBSESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.63%

-33.66%

-65.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-11.60%

-41.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.33%

-20.41%

-69.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.09%

-28.81%

-68.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.57%

-1.00%

-98.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.18%

-6.37%

-84.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.10%

2.82%

+21.28%

Volatility

WEBS vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) at 3.97%. This indicates that WEBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBSESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.31%

3.97%

+14.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.79%

11.45%

+36.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.11%

14.21%

+45.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.26%

18.50%

+63.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.49%

20.54%

+68.95%

WEBS vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEBS vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than ESGV's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.86%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
3.10%3.77%8.02%8.51%0.20%0.00%1.11%0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBS and ESGV have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEBS has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to ESGV (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 11.92% vs -33.85% for WEBS. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ESGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 11.92% return vs -33.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WEBS.

WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.86% for ESGV.

WEBS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. WEBS tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 0.09% for ESGV.

ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBS and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer