WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - WEBN.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while IUSQ.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WEBN.DE returned 25.57% vs 25.48% for IUSQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WEBN.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUSQ.DE.
Performance
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WEBN.DE having a 13.61% return and IUSQ.DE slightly higher at 14.11%.
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.61% | 9.70% | 6.07% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 14.11% | 9.02% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBN.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between WEBN.DE and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WEBN.DE
IUSQ.DE
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBN.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.91 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.91 | 15.96 | -13.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBN.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBN.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBN.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -33.60% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -6.48% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.47% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -4.16% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 1.59% | +7.19% |
Volatility
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBN.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 2.92% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 8.67% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 11.81% | +12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 13.99% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 14.98% | +6.11% |
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBN.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WEBN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WEBN.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBN.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for WEBN.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for WEBN.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer