WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WEBA.DE (Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D) and XMLD.DE (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WEBA.DE tracks the Solactive United States Technology 100 Equal Weight while XMLD.DE tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WEBA.DE returned 16.93%/yr vs 33.99%/yr for XMLD.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WEBA.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLD.DE.

Performance

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBA.DE achieves a 22.42% return, which is significantly lower than XMLD.DE's 42.18% return.

WEBA.DE

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 8.84%
• YTD: 22.42%
• 6M: 22.02%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMLD.DE

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 20.65%
• YTD: 42.18%
• 6M: 39.73%
• 1Y: 73.37%
• 3Y*: 33.99%
• 5Y*: 19.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WEBA.DE Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D	22.42%	1.17%	15.40%	31.31%	-7.67%
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF	42.18%	16.99%	25.17%	54.28%	-5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2022	0.87

The correlation between WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBA.DE

WEBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 67
WEBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
WEBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
WEBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
WEBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
WEBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

XMLD.DE

XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 78
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WEBA.DE	XMLD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.76	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.39	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.44	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	4.62	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	12.52	-1.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WEBA.DE	XMLD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	2.76	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.82	+0.19

Drawdowns

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum XMLD.DE drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEBA.DE	XMLD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.46%	-42.81%	+17.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-15.80%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.46%	-33.67%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-2.30%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-13.51%	+9.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	5.84%	-3.26%

Volatility

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE) is 3.95%, while L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that WEBA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEBA.DE	XMLD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	10.34%	-6.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	19.89%	-10.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.66%	26.47%	-12.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	27.22%	-10.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	28.52%	-11.97%

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBA.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XMLD.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEBA.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

WEBA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while XMLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WEBA.DE Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D	0.55%	0.73%	0.63%	0.05%
XMLD.DE L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE in my portfolio?

WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WEBA.DE or XMLD.DE?

On fees, WEBA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEBA.DE or XMLD.DE?

WEBA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.

What is the main difference between WEBA.DE and XMLD.DE?

WEBA.DE tracks Solactive United States Technology 100 Equal Weight, while XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for WEBA.DE and 0.49% for XMLD.DE.