WDTE vs. RDTY
WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WDTE returned 20.90% vs 20.76% for RDTY. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.01% expense ratio.
Performance
WDTE vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than RDTY's 11.22% return.
WDTE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTY
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 20.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 8.25% | 14.77% |
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 11.22% | 10.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDTE and RDTY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between WDTE and RDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDTE vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank
WDTE
RDTY
WDTE vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDTE | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.27 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.32 | 7.59 | +5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDTE | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.20 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.82 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
WDTE vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum RDTY drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and RDTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDTE | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -17.31% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -9.20% | +1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -2.78% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -2.74% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 2.74% | -1.17% |
Volatility
WDTE vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 3.15%, while YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDTE | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 6.65% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 12.97% | -4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 17.34% | -6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 22.22% | -10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 22.22% | -10.82% |
WDTE vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WDTE and RDTY have an expense ratio of 1.01%.
Dividends
WDTE vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison
WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.66%, less than RDTY's 44.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.39% | 36.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 32.66% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDTE and RDTY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDTY has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to WDTE (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs RDTY's -17.31%.
On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 20.90% vs 20.76% for RDTY. Both ETFs have the same 1.01% expense ratio. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 20.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDTE and RDTY have the same expense ratio: 1.01% per year.
RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 44.39%, compared with 32.66% for WDTE.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax.
WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDTE and RDTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer