PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDTE vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDTE vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WDTE having a 10.59% return and PEPS slightly higher at 10.67%.


WDTE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.43%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.04%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDTE vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
10.59%13.60%-2.87%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%20.32%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between WDTE and PEPS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.88

The correlation between WDTE and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDTE vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDTE vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDTEPEPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.26

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

15.28

+0.24

WDTE vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDTEPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.45

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.05

+0.28

Drawdowns

WDTE vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDTEPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-21.26%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-9.80%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.51%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-2.77%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.09%

-0.54%

Volatility

WDTE vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 2.37%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDTEPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

2.77%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

9.83%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

13.06%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

18.31%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

18.31%

-6.97%

WDTE vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDTE vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%0.00%
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
31.86%35.78%51.80%16.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDTE and PEPS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEPS has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to WDTE (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 31.83% vs 24.07% for WDTE. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 31.83% return vs 24.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.

WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 0.10% for PEPS.

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDTE and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer