WDTE vs. IVVW
WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. WDTE is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, WDTE returned 24.07% vs 20.07% for IVVW. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WDTE charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
WDTE vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's 4.84% return.
WDTE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 10.59% | 13.60% | 7.00% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.84% | 11.71% | 12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDTE and IVVW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between WDTE and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
WDTE vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDTE
IVVW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
WDTE
IVVW
Financial Services
WDTE
IVVW
Communication Services
WDTE
IVVW
Consumer Cyclical
WDTE
IVVW
Healthcare
WDTE
IVVW
Industrials
WDTE
IVVW
Consumer Defensive
WDTE
IVVW
Energy
WDTE
IVVW
Utilities
WDTE
IVVW
Real Estate
WDTE
IVVW
Basic Materials
WDTE
IVVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDTE vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
WDTE
IVVW
WDTE vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDTE | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.61 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.47 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 19.13 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDTE | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.73 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 1.07 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
WDTE vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDTE | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -16.79% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -5.81% | -1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.09% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -1.75% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.05% | +0.50% |
Volatility
WDTE vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 1.13%. This indicates that WDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDTE | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 1.13% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 6.07% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 7.40% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 12.66% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 12.66% | -1.32% |
WDTE vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDTE vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than IVVW's 19.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.70% | 18.55% | 13.72% | 0.00% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 31.86% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDTE and IVVW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDTE has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 24.07% vs 20.07% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 20.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.
WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 19.70% for IVVW.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDTE and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer