WDTE vs. HIMZ
WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while HIMZ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WDTE returned 24.07% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDTE charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for HIMZ.
Performance
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than HIMZ's -58.85% return.
WDTE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIMZ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -58.85%
- 6M
- -69.67%
- 1Y
- -93.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 10.59% | 17.21% |
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | -58.85% | -65.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDTE and HIMZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025 | 0.42 |
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDTE
HIMZ
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Financial Services
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Communication Services
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Healthcare
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Industrials
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Consumer Defensive
WDTE
HIMZ
Energy
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Utilities
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Real Estate
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Basic Materials
WDTE
HIMZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDTE vs. HIMZ — Risk / Return Rank
WDTE
HIMZ
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDTE | HIMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.93 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | -0.96 | +4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | -1.18 | +16.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDTE | HIMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | -0.49 | +2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | -0.40 | +1.73 |
Drawdowns
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum HIMZ drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and HIMZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDTE | HIMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -98.18% | +82.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -98.04% | +90.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -95.53% | +95.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -68.90% | +67.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 79.15% | -77.60% |
Volatility
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 2.37%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a volatility of 53.92%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDTE | HIMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 53.92% | -51.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 131.06% | -122.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 191.74% | -181.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 200.34% | -189.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 200.34% | -189.00% |
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMZ's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDTE vs. HIMZ - Dividend Comparison
WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than HIMZ's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | 5.94% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 31.86% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDTE and HIMZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIMZ has higher volatility (53.92%) compared to WDTE (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs HIMZ's -98.18%.
On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 24.07% vs -93.56% for HIMZ. On fees, WDTE is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 24.07% return vs -93.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDTE is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.
WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 5.94% for HIMZ.
WDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while HIMZ is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 1.31% for HIMZ.
WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDTE and HIMZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer