PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDTE vs. HIMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly higher than HIMZ's -71.55% return.


WDTE

1D
2.50%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-1.94%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIMZ

1D
21.95%
1M
69.46%
YTD
-71.55%
6M
-92.53%
1Y
-88.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WDTE vs. HIMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMZ's 1.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WDTE vs. HIMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMZ
HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDTEHIMZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

-0.43

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

0.02

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.00

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

-0.89

+2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

-1.25

+6.12

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the HIMZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE and HIMZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDTEHIMZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

-0.43

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

-0.44

+1.33

Correlation

The correlation between WDTE and HIMZ is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Dividend Comparison

WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.31%, more than HIMZ's 8.59% yield.


TTM202520242023
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
37.31%35.78%51.80%16.41%
HIMZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
8.59%2.44%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum HIMZ drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and HIMZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WDTEHIMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-98.18%

+82.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-98.18%

+87.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-96.91%

+91.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-64.39%

+62.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

70.45%

-67.79%

Volatility

WDTE vs. HIMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 4.71%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a volatility of 79.45%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WDTEHIMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

79.45%

-74.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

127.80%

-119.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

203.42%

-189.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

203.86%

-192.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

203.86%

-192.56%