PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDTE.L is traded in USD, while XFSN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XFSN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDTE.L achieves a 17.50% return, which is significantly higher than XFSN.L's -3.14% return.


WDTE.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
9.92%
YTD
17.50%
6M
17.76%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
29.43%
5Y*
10Y*

XFSN.L

1D
0.65%
1M
3.76%
YTD
-3.14%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
-2.44%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WDTE.L
Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc
17.50%18.89%34.72%33.63%
XFSN.L
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-3.14%10.70%32.64%15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between WDTE.L and XFSN.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.71

The correlation between WDTE.L and XFSN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDTE.L
WDTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WDTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XFSN.L
XFSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDTE.LXFSN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.99

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

-0.10

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

-0.22

+7.25

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE.L and XFSN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDTE.LXFSN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

-0.15

+2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

0.73

+0.84

Drawdowns

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE.L drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, roughly equal to the maximum XFSN.L drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE.L and XFSN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDTE.LXFSN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-24.74%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-24.74%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

-24.74%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-11.37%

+7.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-6.01%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

11.19%

-5.60%

Volatility

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) at 4.32%. This indicates that WDTE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDTE.LXFSN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

4.32%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

12.43%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

16.34%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

20.25%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

20.25%

+1.60%

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XFSN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDTE.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDTE.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WDTE.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDTE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDTE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XFSN.L.

WDTE.L tracks S&P World ESG Enhanced Information Technology Index, while XFSN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDTE.L and 0.35% for XFSN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDTE.L and XFSN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer