WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WDNR.DE (Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and JMLP.DE (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - WDNR.DE tracks the Bloomberg BioEnergy ESG while JMLP.DE tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDNR.DE returned 15.63%/yr vs 23.96%/yr for JMLP.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDNR.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMLP.DE.

Performance

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDNR.DE achieves a 32.56% return, which is significantly higher than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.

WDNR.DE

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 32.56%
• 6M: 30.95%
• 1Y: 52.57%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 15.63%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

JMLP.DE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 27.39%
• 6M: 24.82%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: 24.31%
• 5Y*: 23.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WDNR.DE Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc	32.56%	10.93%	-16.29%	-1.60%	53.34%	50.49%	2.40%
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	27.39%	-5.93%	44.53%	15.63%	34.66%	55.73%	7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDNR.DE

WDNR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 90
WDNR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
WDNR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
WDNR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WDNR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
WDNR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

JMLP.DE

JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 38
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDNR.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	1.30	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.02	1.81	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.22	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.91	2.22	+3.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.02	6.04	+17.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDNR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDNR.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	1.30	+1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	1.16	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	1.35	-1.10

Drawdowns

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDNR.DE drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDNR.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.27%	-22.29%	-39.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-11.02%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.75%	-22.29%	-12.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.22%	-22.29%	-17.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-5.15%	+3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.70%	-5.87%	-10.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	4.05%	-1.87%

Volatility

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WDNR.DE) is 4.95%, while HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that WDNR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDNR.DE	JMLP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	6.65%	-1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	15.30%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	18.80%	-1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.68%	20.38%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.02%	21.66%	+5.36%

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDNR.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDNR.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison

WDNR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JMLP.DE HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.77%	3.38%	5.41%	11.39%	11.27%	14.07%	8.95%
WDNR.DE Amundi Global BioEnergy ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE in my portfolio?

WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WDNR.DE or JMLP.DE?

On fees, WDNR.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDNR.DE or JMLP.DE?

WDNR.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JMLP.DE.

What is the main difference between WDNR.DE and JMLP.DE?

WDNR.DE tracks Bloomberg BioEnergy ESG, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WDNR.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.