PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDEF.L vs. COFF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDEF.L is traded in EUR, while COFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COFF.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDEF.L achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than COFF.L's -23.11% return.


WDEF.L

1D
-1.17%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
0.87%
6M
5.27%
1Y
-5.08%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*

COFF.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-8.89%
YTD
-23.11%
6M
-28.10%
1Y
-15.03%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
19.30%
10Y*
5.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDEF.L
WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR
0.87%26.22%-2.46%20.25%-19.48%26.65%3.41%37.42%-17.34%4.40%
COFF.L
WisdomTree Coffee
-23.11%14.46%86.46%20.79%-16.08%75.32%-19.49%16.26%-23.70%-15.96%

Correlation

The correlation between WDEF.L and COFF.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2017

0.02

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDEF.L
COFF.L

Industrials

89.7%

-

Technology

3.2%

-

Communication Services

0.4%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

WDEF.L
89.7%
COFF.L

-

Technology

WDEF.L
3.2%
COFF.L

-

Communication Services

WDEF.L
0.4%
COFF.L

-

Healthcare

WDEF.L
0.1%
COFF.L

-

Basic Materials

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L

-

Consumer Defensive

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L

-

Energy

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L

-

Financial Services

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L

-

Real Estate

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L

-

Utilities

WDEF.L

-

COFF.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDEF.L
WDEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WDEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

COFF.L
COFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
COFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
COFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L) and WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDEF.LCOFF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.95

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.45

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

-0.84

+0.31

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDEF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the COFF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDEF.L and COFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDEF.LCOFF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

-0.44

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.56

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-0.02

+0.35

Drawdowns

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDEF.L drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum COFF.L drawdown of -84.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEF.L and COFF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDEF.LCOFF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-84.95%

+49.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.81%

-33.01%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.81%

-39.55%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

-42.88%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

-48.40%

+33.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-54.22%

+45.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.11%

17.78%

-8.67%

Volatility

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L) has a higher volatility of 10.75% compared to WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) at 9.84%. This indicates that WDEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDEF.LCOFF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.75%

9.84%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.30%

21.70%

+42.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.62%

34.36%

+39.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.70%

34.87%

+7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.66%

31.63%

+10.03%

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDEF.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than COFF.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDEF.L vs. COFF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDEF.L nor COFF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WDEF.L and COFF.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEF.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEF.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COFF.L.

WDEF.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while COFF.L is Agricultural Commodities. WDEF.L tracks WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS Index, while COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDEF.L and 0.49% for COFF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDEF.L and COFF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer