WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L
WDEE.L (Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - WDEE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index, while XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WDEE.L returned 19.17%/yr vs 37.77%/yr for XLKS.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDEE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDEE.L achieves a 30.95% return, which is significantly higher than XLKS.L's 26.46% return.
WDEE.L
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 30.95%
- 6M
- 29.56%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 26.46%
- 6M
- 26.13%
- 1Y
- 57.45%
- 3Y*
- 37.77%
- 5Y*
- 25.84%
- 10Y*
- 26.65%
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WDEE.L Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 30.95% | 9.01% | 4.02% | 7.64% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 26.46% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 34.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDEE.L and XLKS.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between WDEE.L and XLKS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WDEE.L
XLKS.L
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDEE.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.36 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 10.07 | +2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDEE.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.85 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.05 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDEE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEE.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDEE.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -34.26% | +15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -16.99% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.54% | -26.97% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -0.85% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -5.09% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 5.69% | -2.44% |
Volatility
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) have volatilities of 6.80% and 6.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDEE.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 6.80% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.28% | 15.34% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 20.11% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 23.78% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 22.03% | -2.92% |
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDEE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WDEE.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WDEE.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WDEE.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WDEE.L.
WDEE.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDEE.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for WDEE.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer