PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDEE.L vs. WENS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDEE.L is traded in USD, while WENS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WENS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WDEE.L having a 30.95% return and WENS.L slightly higher at 31.64%.


WDEE.L

1D
2.00%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
30.95%
6M
29.56%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10Y*

WENS.L

1D
1.76%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
31.64%
6M
27.89%
1Y
41.42%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
30.95%9.01%4.02%7.64%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
31.64%11.03%0.39%1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between WDEE.L and WENS.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.92

The correlation between WDEE.L and WENS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDEE.LWENS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.29

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

11.20

+0.92

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the WENS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDEE.L and WENS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDEE.LWENS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.00

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.70

+0.15

Drawdowns

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDEE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum WENS.L drawdown of -20.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEE.L and WENS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDEE.LWENS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-20.04%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-12.53%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-20.04%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-5.55%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-5.43%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.69%

-0.44%

Volatility

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) is 6.80%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that WDEE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDEE.LWENS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

7.60%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

17.82%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

20.66%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

22.39%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

22.39%

-3.28%

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDEE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WDEE.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDEE.L nor WENS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDEE.L and WENS.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.

WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDEE.L and 0.25% for WENS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDEE.L and WENS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer