PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDEE.L is traded in USD, while SPOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDEE.L achieves a 30.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPOG.L's 28.12% return.


WDEE.L

1D
2.00%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
30.95%
6M
29.56%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10Y*

SPOG.L

1D
1.71%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
28.12%
6M
24.78%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
30.95%9.01%4.02%7.64%
SPOG.L
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF
28.12%6.60%-1.10%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WDEE.L and SPOG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.87

The correlation between WDEE.L and SPOG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOG.L
SPOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDEE.LSPOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.40

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

6.20

+5.92

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDEE.L and SPOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDEE.LSPOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.37

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.11

+0.74

Drawdowns

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDEE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum SPOG.L drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEE.L and SPOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDEE.LSPOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-83.96%

+65.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-15.11%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-27.79%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-8.71%

+5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-34.84%

+30.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

5.85%

-2.60%

Volatility

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) is 6.80%, while iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that WDEE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDEE.LSPOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

9.20%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

22.39%

-7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

26.40%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

30.35%

-11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

32.90%

-13.79%

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDEE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDEE.L vs. SPOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDEE.L nor SPOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WDEE.L and SPOG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.

WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index, while SPOG.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDEE.L and 0.55% for SPOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDEE.L and SPOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer