PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDEE.L is traded in USD, while MLPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MLPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDEE.L achieves a 30.95% return, which is significantly higher than MLPP.L's 19.40% return.


WDEE.L

1D
2.00%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
30.95%
6M
29.56%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10Y*

MLPP.L

1D
1.16%
1M
1.15%
YTD
19.40%
6M
16.38%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WDEE.L and MLPP.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.72

The correlation between WDEE.L and MLPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPP.L
MLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDEE.LMLPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.04

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

5.16

+6.96

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDEE.L and MLPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDEE.LMLPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.07

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.04

+0.88

Drawdowns

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDEE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum MLPP.L drawdown of -88.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEE.L and MLPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDEE.LMLPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-88.93%

+70.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-8.01%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-17.53%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-23.01%

+19.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-47.07%

+43.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.17%

+0.08%

Volatility

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) at 5.95%. This indicates that WDEE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDEE.LMLPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

5.95%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

12.18%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

15.21%

+3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

21.59%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

32.87%

-13.76%

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDEE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDEE.L vs. MLPP.L - Dividend Comparison

WDEE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.51%8.28%7.99%8.81%7.86%8.40%6.01%0.13%0.13%0.11%0.10%0.15%
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDEE.L and MLPP.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPP.L.

WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index, while MLPP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDEE.L and 0.50% for MLPP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDEE.L and MLPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer