PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDEE.DE achieves a 33.31% return, which is significantly higher than EQQB.DE's 20.54% return.


WDEE.DE

1D
2.19%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
33.31%
6M
28.72%
1Y
38.58%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
10Y*

EQQB.DE

1D
-0.82%
1M
9.26%
YTD
20.54%
6M
19.36%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WDEE.DE
Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc
33.31%-2.96%9.29%6.37%
EQQB.DE
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
20.54%6.93%33.67%28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between WDEE.DE and EQQB.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.13

The correlation between WDEE.DE and EQQB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDEE.DE
WDEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WDEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQB.DE
EQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.DE) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDEE.DEEQQB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.73

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

11.10

-1.59

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDEE.DE and EQQB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDEE.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.39

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.97

-0.27

Drawdowns

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum EQQB.DE drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDEE.DE and EQQB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDEE.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-26.59%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-10.08%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-26.59%

+2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-0.82%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-6.77%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.39%

+0.46%

Volatility

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P World Energy ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) at 4.38%. This indicates that WDEE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDEE.DEEQQB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

4.38%

+3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

10.99%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

15.73%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

19.97%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

19.97%

-0.03%

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDEE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQB.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDEE.DE vs. EQQB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WDEE.DE nor EQQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WDEE.DE and EQQB.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQB.DE.

WDEE.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EQQB.DE is Nasdaq-100. WDEE.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Energy, while EQQB.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WDEE.DE and 0.30% for EQQB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDEE.DE and EQQB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer