WDAF vs. WDEF.L
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and WDEF.L (WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR) are both Aerospace & Defense funds from WisdomTree - WDAF tracks the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index while WDEF.L tracks the WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDEF.L.
Performance
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WDAF is traded in USD, while WDEF.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WDEF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than WDEF.L's -0.33% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDEF.L
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- -3.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
WDEF.L WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR | -0.33% | -6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and WDEF.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. WDEF.L — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
WDEF.L
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | WDEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.34 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum WDEF.L drawdown of -41.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and WDEF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | WDEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -41.69% | +23.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -16.16% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -11.68% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.59% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | WDEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 65.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 74.48% | -42.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 44.73% | -12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 43.58% | -11.48% |
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WDEF.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. WDEF.L - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while WDEF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% |
WDEF.L WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and WDEF.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDEF.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDEF.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while WDEF.L tracks WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.40% for WDEF.L.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and WDEF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer