WDAF vs. ITA
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - WDAF tracks the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index while ITA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITA.
Performance
WDAF vs. ITA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WDAF having a 10.54% return and ITA slightly lower at 10.04%.
WDAF
- 1D
- -5.17%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITA
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 29.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.50%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.66%
WDAF vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 10.54% | -7.71% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 10.04% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and ITA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITA
WDAF vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDAF | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum ITA drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and ITA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -59.72% | +39.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.04% | -5.72% | -11.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -9.45% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.01% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.59% | 21.90% | +10.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 20.23% | +12.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 23.23% | +9.36% |
WDAF vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ITA's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and ITA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.38% for ITA.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and ITA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer