WDAF vs. IBHE
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while IBHE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHE.
Performance
WDAF vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF vs. IBHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and IBHE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. IBHE — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
IBHE
WDAF vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.41 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum IBHE drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and IBHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -26.91% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | 0.00% | -16.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -1.42% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 0.78% | +31.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 4.87% | +27.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 11.53% | +20.57% |
WDAF vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IBHE's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 2.29% | 4.53% | 6.92% | 7.17% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 5.74% | 3.73% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and IBHE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
IBHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IBHE is High Yield Bonds. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.35% for IBHE.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and IBHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer