PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDAF vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDAF vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


WDAF

1D
-2.42%
1M
-7.27%
6M
-9.73%
YTD
4.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDAF vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WDAF
WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund
4.66%-7.71%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%26.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WDAF and BITI is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDAF vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDAF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDAF vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDAFBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

WDAF vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDAF vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDAFBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-92.16%

+70.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.46%

-85.94%

+64.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-68.34%

+60.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.11%

Volatility

WDAF vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDAFBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.08%

44.14%

-11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.08%

52.28%

-19.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.08%

52.28%

-19.20%

WDAF vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDAF vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
WDAF
WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund
0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDAF and BITI have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.13% for WDAF.

WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 1.03% for BITI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDAF and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer