WDAF vs. BDRY
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
WDAF vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 44.24% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 33.44%
- YTD
- 44.24%
- 1Y
- 74.48%
- 3Y*
- 37.75%
- 5Y*
- -12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 3.22% | -7.71% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 44.24% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and BDRY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDRY
WDAF vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDAF | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -89.16% | +66.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.54% | -69.53% | +46.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -58.52% | +50.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.92% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.85% | 41.13% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 59.91% | -27.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 62.24% | -29.39% |
WDAF vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and BDRY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
WDAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BDRY is Commodities. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 3.76% for BDRY.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer