WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L
WCOS.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) and XLYS.L (Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - WCOS.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while XLYS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L returned 5.64%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for XLYS.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCOS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLYS.L.
Performance
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOS.L achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly higher than XLYS.L's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L has underperformed XLYS.L with an annualized return of 5.64%, while XLYS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
WCOS.L
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
XLYS.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOS.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF | 3.77% | 8.52% | 5.94% | 1.94% | -5.27% | 12.81% | 7.61% | 22.47% | -10.18% | 17.35% |
XLYS.L Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -3.17% | 7.65% | 28.46% | 39.95% | -33.91% | 28.81% | 26.41% | 28.22% | 0.45% | 22.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOS.L and XLYS.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WCOS.L and XLYS.L has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCOS.L
XLYS.L
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
WCOS.L
XLYS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
WCOS.L
XLYS.L
Healthcare
WCOS.L
XLYS.L
-
Basic Materials
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Communication Services
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Energy
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Financial Services
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Industrials
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
Real Estate
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Technology
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
Utilities
WCOS.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WCOS.L
XLYS.L
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCOS.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.09 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 0.61 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 1.79 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCOS.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 0.48 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.38 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.61 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.84 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum XLYS.L drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOS.L and XLYS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOS.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -37.47% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -13.87% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -26.13% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -37.47% | +19.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.55% | -37.47% | +13.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.86% | -6.54% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -6.87% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 4.72% | -0.37% |
Volatility
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) is 4.60%, while Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that WCOS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLYS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCOS.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.72% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 13.57% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 17.66% | -5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 22.31% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 20.89% | -8.31% |
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCOS.L vs. XLYS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOS.L nor XLYS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCOS.L and XLYS.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLYS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLYS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOS.L.
WCOS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XLYS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOS.L and 0.14% for XLYS.L.
Find the right allocation for WCOS.L and XLYS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer