WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L
WCOS.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) and CSTP.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from State Street - WCOS.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while CSTP.L tracks the MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L returned 5.96%/yr vs 4.08%/yr for CSTP.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCOS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CSTP.L.
Performance
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WCOS.L is traded in USD, while CSTP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOS.L achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than CSTP.L's 5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L has outperformed CSTP.L with an annualized return of 5.96%, while CSTP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.
WCOS.L
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
CSTP.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.08%
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOS.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF | 9.42% | 8.52% | 5.94% | 1.93% | -5.25% | 12.81% | 7.59% | 22.45% | -10.18% | 17.34% |
CSTP.L State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF | 5.05% | 21.55% | -8.40% | 3.86% | -13.42% | 12.05% | 5.32% | 22.26% | -13.22% | 24.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOS.L and CSTP.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between WCOS.L and CSTP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
WCOS.L
CSTP.L
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCOS.L | CSTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.65 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 1.34 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum CSTP.L drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOS.L and CSTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOS.L | CSTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -25.90% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -13.79% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.61% | -16.50% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -24.76% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | -25.90% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -5.30% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -6.88% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 6.63% | -1.77% |
Volatility
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L) have volatilities of 4.86% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCOS.L | CSTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 5.08% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 12.24% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 14.99% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 15.13% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 14.78% | -2.19% |
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTP.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCOS.L vs. CSTP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOS.L nor CSTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCOS.L and CSTP.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSTP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSTP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOS.L.
WCOS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CSTP.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOS.L and 0.18% for CSTP.L.
Find the right allocation for WCOS.L and CSTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer